News Summary
A significant wrongful death lawsuit filed in Texas raises questions about interstate abortion laws. A Texas father accuses a California doctor of illegally mailing abortion pills that allegedly resulted in the death of two unborn children. This case could reshape the legal landscape surrounding abortion disputes and the rights of fathers, while testing the boundaries of state and federal legislation.
San Antonio, Texas — Landmark Lawsuit Challenges Interstate Abortion Laws
A groundbreaking wrongful death lawsuit has been filed in federal court in the Southern District of Texas, marking a significant legal development surrounding abortion laws and interstate medical procedures. The case centers on a Texas father’s allegations against a California doctor, claiming that the illegal mailing of abortion pills resulted in the death of two unborn children.
Key Details of the Lawsuit
Filed on July 20, 2025, the lawsuit was initiated by Jerry Rodriguez, a father from Texas, who is seeking justice for the loss of his children. He accuses Remy Coeytaux, a California-based physician, of unlawfully mailing abortion pills across state lines during two instances—September 2024 and January 2025. Rodriguez contends that these pills, used by his girlfriend, Kendal Garza, led to miscarriages that resulted in the deaths of their unborn babies.
The lawsuit also extends charges against Kendal Garza’s estranged husband, Adam Garza, and her mother, for their involvement in procuring the abortion pills, adding layers of complexity to the legal action. Payments for the medication, totaling $150 via Venmo, indicate a direct purchase from Coeytaux, suggesting deliberate intent in the procurement process.
Legal Allegations and Violations
Rodriguez’s legal team asserts that Coeytaux violated the Comstock Act, a federal law enacted in the 18th century that prohibits mailing items intended for abortions. The case argues that mailing the pills knowingly, with the purpose of inducing abortions, constitutes a federal offense. The lawsuit also claims violations of Texas laws concerning the provision of abortion drugs, which legally restrict abortions except in cases of medical emergencies.
Legal Context and State Laws
Texas has enacted strict abortion laws, including the comprehensive Heartbeat Bill (SB 8), which effectively bans most abortions after approximately six weeks of pregnancy. Under Texas law, women cannot be sued or prosecuted for having an abortion; however, providers and those assisting patients can face legal action. This case tests the limits of such laws, particularly in the context of mailed medications crossing state lines into a state with restrictive abortion policies.
Background on the Case and Personal Settlement
Kendal Garza reportedly became pregnant a third time in May 2025. Rodriguez claims that she took abortion pills during her first pregnancy under pressure from her estranged husband and her mother. He states that Garza took the medication at her mother’s residence and Adam’s home in Galveston County. Following the procedure, Garza sent Rodriguez messages about needing to cut the umbilical cord and bury the fetus without disclosing the location.
Rodriguez began dating Garza in June 2024, and she initially expressed a desire to have the child. However, her estranged husband pressured her into terminating subsequent pregnancies. The lawsuit indicates concern that Garza might face similar pressure again as she becomes pregnant anew in May 2025.
Legal and Broader Implications
This case raises questions about the legal standing of fathers in abortion-related disputes, as Rodriguez seeks to establish his right to sue. He is demanding at least $75,000 in damages and an injunction to prevent Coeytaux from distributing abortion-inducing drugs in the future. The case also alleges felony murder against Coeytaux, asserting that his actions knowingly caused the deaths of two unborn children.
Legal experts view this lawsuit as a test case regarding the jurisdictional boundaries of abortion laws after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, which shifted authority over abortion laws to individual states. It also signals the potential for future pro-life litigation targeting abortion providers across state lines, particularly in states with restrictive abortion policies that seek to challenge or extend legal protections through interstate actions.
Potential Impact and Future Legal Battles
The outcome of this suit could set a precedent for expanding legal protections for children conceived and the rights of fathers in abortion cases. It also underscores ongoing debates about the reach of federal laws versus state restrictions, especially in the context of mailed medications and interstate health care services. As the case progresses, it is expected to influence ongoing discussions on legal accountability and the scope of abortion-related laws in the United States.
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
Federal Lawsuit Challenges Texas Shield Laws Over Abortion Pills
New York Clerk Blocks Enforcement of Texas Abortion Fine
Additional Resources
- Christian Post
- Wikipedia: Abortion in the United States
- Fox News
- Encyclopedia Britannica: Abortion
- Washington Post
- Google Search: Texas abortion lawsuit
- USA Herald
- Google Scholar: Abortion lawsuits
- Statesman
- Google News: Abortion case Texas
- Fortune
Author: STAFF HERE VIRGINIA BEACH WRITER
VIRGINIA BEACH STAFF WRITER The VIRGINIA BEACH STAFF WRITER represents the seasoned team at HEREVirginiaBeach.com, your trusted source for actionable local news and information in Virginia Beach, Virginia Beach City, and beyond, delivering "news you can use" with comprehensive coverage of product reviews for personal and business needs, local business directories, politics, real estate trends, neighborhood insights, and state news impacting the region—supported by years of expert reporting and strong community input, including local press releases and business updates, while offering top reporting on high-profile events like the Virginia Beach Neptune Festival, East Coast Surfing Championship, and military homecoming celebrations, alongside key organizations such as the Virginia Aquarium, Virginia Beach Convention Center, and Oceana Naval Air Station, plus leading businesses in tourism and defense like Busch Gardens and Northrop Grumman, and as part of the broader HERE network including HEREWilliamsburg.com, providing credible, in-depth insights into Virginia's vibrant landscape. HERE Virginia Beach HERE Williamsburg
